Mon 23 Dec 1996 08:39
[RS-CL.DOC]
R-C
I'm not quite sure what to make of this, but for the next while, I am
going to try. I am a 20-year-old male in the US I have grown up in a
certain sort of culture, and I live in one now. I am concerned with
achieving and maintaining the greatest level of concentration for the
greatest amount of time that I can.
What is the best concentration I can achieve? Actually, the purpose of
this writing is to attempt to understand my relationship to Rebecca.
This relation is one which has occupied a great part of my attention
for some time. This relation has in the past, and is now commanding a
fair amount of concentration.
We are working with a great uncertainty in determining the value of
this concentration. First, I have focused for so long on the
male-female relation as being perhaps the most important part of
living, my present perspective is certainly affected by this past
focus. However much I would like to not be bothered with the idea of
the male-female relation, I still am. Perhaps because I have not found
anything better.
I don't know what level of a question this is, because there is a huge
missing here. I need something to do, and I want it to be my own. I
guess that is what this is. . . .
There are a few things we could talk about, but I'd rather not. I am in
the do-nothing. She no longer exists in this world, because she is not
here. She existed in a world that is a little while ago, but no more.
Most people are fairly content to be content, but I will never be;
Contentness disgusts me, fervor is more appealing, and disillusionment
is the only true way. Let us pretend however, that in spite of all
this, and for some peculiar reason, my disillusionment and incapability
of action is somehow appealing to this other person. Supposing she
didn't mind me terribly the way I am, what would happen then?
Of course this is impossible. But nothing is going on now, it does not
hurt to play in impossibilities. First, would having someone like her
to be with on occasion be conducive to my overall goal of
disillusionment? We must consider a few things.
She will never be there to be with. She has many other people, and
these people are important to her. I am one among many. Hmm, not too
different from Kristen. Yet, I guess with Rebecca, for a while anyways,
I had a lot of time, a lot more than the others.
Would my greater goal of disillusionment be served by such a relation
with this person? Is my goal really disillusionment? Pirsig's goal is
Quality, the achievement of a quality life. Isn't it beautiful that he
was about to find the most quality in Suicide? Perhaps he was desperate
to escape negative concentration. My goal, as stated in the past, is to
achieve sustainable positive concentration, this involves creating a
world in which I have no desire for more control, or perhaps, accepting
what incredibly amazing control I have in my present situation.
Sustainable is a concern, and yet it is an impossibility. If I fix my
motorcycle for today, or for the next 10 years, what difference does it
make. Sustainable is an impossibility, it is a desire for control which
cannot be realized. The goal should be modified to be the achievement
of positive concentration.
Isn't that terribly sad, though, to think that whatever concentration I
may find will never last. This is sad. The trick is, though, to be so
concentrated that the future and the possibility of the end of the
concentration is not realized. This is not easy at all, and yet, that
is how it is done. I don't read those fiction books any more, because I
know the alternative reality they offer doesn't last. Yet plenty of
people enjoy them. I have destroyed that type of concentration for
myself. At any rate, I think sustainability as a goal is conducive to
disillusionment. This is very different from the goal of being a
sustainable person, or a person whose way of living is sustainable by
the environment if all people lived the same way as you, something like
that.
Second-- is relation with Rebecca conducive to positive concentration?
Certainly this relation has proven to be conducive to concentration, a
good deal of which is not positive, because I am continually wanting
what I cannot have, sustainability, and an overwhelming intensity of
concentration from both of us.
But positive concentration? can she create a static desire, inspire
static emotion? That seems unreasonable to ask of living woman. But you
know, I will never be "there" until that static desire is the only
desire I have. It is the same thing as positive concentration.
I guess the people who exemplify this static emotion are those who
meditate for years and years and this is what they do. Their culture is
more developed than ours, but, it seems, we will destroy theirs
anyways, and then, perhaps, eventually evolve that way ourselves,
however, I think there are a number of things discouraging the
evolution of static emotion in present-day US society, but maybe (as
some visionaries say) it is happening.
Clearly I am foolish even messing with another living person. Of
course, we are talking about living here. Why does it matter if you're
happy while you're alive if I'm going to die anyway? Exactly. So let us
concentrate on the angst-producing activities now, and I can worry
about being happy after I die, though, perhaps, and it does indeed
seem, that I won't have to worry about being happy after I am dead.
We are certainly getting somewhere now. I think I may have been right
last April when I said my goal was to be "tragic." I realize I could be
happy now, and I know how I could effect this, but I may as well wait
until I die, because I will be automatically happy then anyways. Yet
living a tragic life sounds so exciting, much more active than
"disillusionment," yet only a little more difficult to attain. I'm not
sure if Rebecca will be as enthusiastic about tragedy as I am, but
remember, I am assuming she will be, because if I am, and she's not, or
if I am and she doesn't like that, then we don't have to worry about
any of this at all.
Is this relation with Rebecca conducive to a tragic existence? Why yes!
I doubt I have the gumption to play out a full traditional tragedy
involving multiple deaths, but then what sort of tragedy would that be?
It ends. This is a problem too, a tragedy which is over quickly is not
as tragic as one that lasts for years.
The question is, what do I want, and is it what I really want. After I
decided to live, I decided that I could choose what I wanted, but I had
better choose something. It appeared that I had certain biological
needs, and these were things that any living organism would want, food,
sex, family, sleep, etc. Happiness is not such a great goal after all,
what should I focus on? How about, let's not think about it. That would
be fine if I were busy doing things, but I am not, and there's nothing
I want to do, because I think about it. Yet there are some things I
don't think about the point of, because I know the point, I do my
school work, because I like to concentrate in that way, and if I do
well, I get to keep concentrating.
But Rebecca is not so simple. I guess I hope that maybe someday she
won't be taking off, and we can hang out together for a while. This is
not a valid concern now.
Let us imagine we are back, and she's around, and we get to see eachother. What do we do then.
Really, I do nothing. I do excercise, and do my work, and perhaps
someday I will read my books, and do work on consciousness ed, but to
be honest I don't do much.
If she were here, I would really like to have vaginal sex with her,
that seems to be the direction things go for me, and that is what I
think of now, that I think of it. Then, after I got my sexual tension
out of my system, we could go for a walk. That would be a lot of fun.
Then we could come back, and probably eat something, then we could go
to bed and she or I could read something. I could always mastubate
though. Masturbation is however less appealing to me now. In fact, the
whole sex business is less appealing to me now because it is such a
problem. What would really happen is this. She would come over, we
would hug, I'd get aroused, she too probably, etc, I'd cum eventually,
and then we'd hang out there quietly. It is for some reason disturbing
to have that be all we do. And it is nice to go on walks with her.
But what is the deal? There is some strange want here that cannot be
fulfilled and is just going to make me unhappy about things, which
isn't bad, I just thought I'd wonder. I really don't know what to make
of this.
The only thing I have from her is that she someday wants a house and a
garden, and perhaps, if she can, someone to live with her.
So what will I do then? See her as long as she has attention for me.
When she gets sick of me doing nothing, things will be back, more or
less as they were. That seems about right.
I only really have one question of hers to work with, and that is, "Why
me?" She has a lot of friends, very different from my situation, I
guess that makes me wary or worrysome about something. She has more
things to concentrate on than this, and does, yet, it seems, I would
not have more, and want only this. I don't do anything with it, though.
Why her, well, she has quality for me, she causes concentration, which
I think is better than no concentration even when bad. I do like to be
with her, I like to think about her, I respect her and love her. I do
wonder about her though, like I wonder about my self, will we be able
to live as we want to live, and is how we want to live the way that is
best to live. That is all. Why her? There aren't many like her. She
does care about appearance it seems, and while maybe she's getting more
like them, she's not like all those other women trying to be beautiful,
pretty cute sexy, whatever, she's not really any of those, except to
people who love her, and in that case she is more any of those than
anyone else. I love to see her outside with all her clothes on to stay
warm. I am not sure she is so enthusiastic about myself, and that
bothers me, but that is life. If she wants to feel differently about
me, perhaps she will feel differently, and maybe she does think I'm
beautiful who knows. It's no big deal. I am beautiful, and I'm pretty
ugly. Whichever you like. Just as her. And yet there are times when I
am not beautiful at all, and perhaps she too. It may be she is really
beautiful, and what I see is in her and not in me, and she then may be
right in not seeing the same in me. That is probably how it is, if it
is the case.
Is this "why her" business really important? I know why her, it is
because she likes me, and why me? it is because I like her. And do I
like her only because I'm lonely? Does that matter? This is not a state
that will change soon, or even with her, though it does, and then I
have to leave. So you see, I am pretty sorry, but oh well. Those
Self-Actualized are hard to get to know. they are so content and
unmotivated to need. or whatever.
I was hoping that thinking about this would give me some idea of what I
want to do with her, and I have no idea, I have no Idea. I don't know.
Well, she has a warm body if she wants one, as long as I'm alive. I
don't live off her motivation, there's plenty I am unmotivated to do,
even with her, but I guess we may find those whom we are motivated to
do the most things with. And perhaps I will find a few things I am
wholly motivated to do and then a person who I am motivated to do those
things with. See you again someday Rebecca.
love,
Colin
Really, that is it. No answers, only questions, just as there are
supposed to be. Not disillusionment, only constant wondering, and the
lack of a set of values in my interaction with her, like it seems I
have been developing a set of values and a way of acting with regard to
my work at school. Yet because she is as yet valueless, I don't know
how to act myself in relation to her, she is an unknown, I don't know
what we do, why, or how this relation works. And like a kid leaving the
country for the unknown city, it seems I will hang around until,
perhaps, someday, I get a little better idea of what is going on, and
then decide my ways of acting in regard to her.
Questions of my own: I should ask her questions, but I don't want to. I
wish she would tell me what she wants to tell me. I seem to talk/write
enough without being asked, and it is almost, almost as possible that
she has little to talk or write.
This whole thing should be considered with her in mind. Is there
anything which I could talk to her about here that would be worthwhile?
Not so much actually. If she gets bored, or interested, she could look
this over, and then perhaps we'd have some basis for involving
conversation, but no, really there is nothing I need to say, or would
be helpful to say,
though I do think It would be good for her to know that all this
personal conversation has occurred, and the ideas here are like
thoughts going through a person's brain, only some of which will be
used later, only some resulting in some sort of action or further
thought, yet each representing a brain state which was the result of
all past experience. I can't wait to escape this place and be back in
seattle, only because that is where I go to school, and that is where I
live more as I want to, and there are some nicer places to go running,
but they could be much better (more unpaved trails for very long runs,
no road/city/sidewalk running at all would be cool). And Rebecca will
be there, but I don't know what she means to me. I think, like me to
her, we mean to the other what we let the other mean, but it is
different. I am learning some of her caution, and some reservation of
my own. I don't think this is a bad thing, only that we are reserved
because that is the most sustainable way to be in this situation. bye.
And perhaps even the level of interaction we have shown is a wrong way.
It's like we go as far into the cave as we can, still able to see some
light from the entryway, to see if we like this kind of travel. If we
don't, we can get out without much worry or disaster. To see if we like
this kind of travel. I am concerned, Rebecca, that you take care of
your physical self, and likewise, I am concerned with myself. That was
what that flabbiness talk was about in the earlier writing, It is that
I am afraid of a person becoming sort of like my mom, who takes care of
others, but not herself so well. This is perhaps a bad thing , an
unhappy causing thing to mention, but I do because I am scared to not
talk about it. And I am scared because of your idea that we gain 10
pounds for every ten years we live, or something like that. Mostly, it
is because I know that mental and physical health cannot exist well
without the other.
On the appropriateness of lecturing you, or you me. It is not
appropriate to lecture me about furry animals, and yet it is about
grades. You were cool about me getting my paper done in the time I took
to do it, and I'd like to do the same for your sixth month report. Does
mentioning things in this way necessarily cause bad feelings? Maybe it
does. But I wanted to change grades wise, not fuzzy animals wise. It is
inappropriate to discuss flabbiness with you, or is it? I don't want
you to get fat any more than you want me to get fat. I think the only
thing I was concerned about was you accepting the idea that you would
get fat. That bugged me. Besides that, nothing about flabbiness in
regard to you bothers me, I just want to be reassured you don't mind me
feeling your belly, because I like to. I am self conscious (or was)
about my flabbiness, and I won't be perfectly happy sitting on the edge
of your bed until it's gone, but that's life. I don't mind you patting
my belly (while I have one). It Is hard to say whether I will lose
weight here because I don't like eating the food or I will not because
of what I do eat. It seems I mind flabbiness on me. Um, don't worry
about your weight, unless it bothers you and you feel unhealthy (as I
do) because it doesn't bother me. And if it did bother me, I'm counting
on you not caring, although you might in spite of yourself. I guess
what scares me is the idea of you accepting the idea of you "changing
your weight," or it being "normal" to be able to gain more weight as
one gets older. Even as I say this, I realize that you may be right,
but I am not sure. Tradition has it, that skinny old people are
unhealthy, but I doubt that. Tradition has it that people get fatter as
they get older, but this does not happen in everybody, most notably
those who take care of their physical selves. Well this is, perhaps, on
the whole a stupid thing to talk about, but I am motivated to be
unflabby myself, and my mom's lack of care for herself, and my lack of
care for myself, and my dad and sisters too, scares me. I guess this
sort of stuff is on my mind often, but I don't often talk of it, I just
reach down and squeeze a fold of fat on my belly (especially when I'm
hungry). You, of course, are fine, and I would probably be bothered if
you were more skinny. I do wonder what the effect of this writing will
be on your impression of me. I keep returning to it because this (and
any sort of lecturing) is so taboo, and a great way to make people
unhappy. It is funny that I would dwell on this more than the
occasional desire to be injured by a bus, but I suppose that taboo of a
male speaking about weight to a female has this effect when one does
try to talk about it.
I am not going to work on the mom-colin project, because of what little
effect it would have on my future existence, since I see her so rarely,
I will only ever have one mom, and she is not too receptive to this
sort of discussion because she has so few questions, and many ideas of
how things should be. This is not a bad thing, well it is bad in that
it means that there is little chance for involved and intimate
discussions with her. That's it. Moreover, I'm pretty bad at this sort
of discussion, but then, It is only me I have to talk to most of the
time.
Ok, that is all for now. I can think about this more after she has
reacted to it, or after I have seen her again, if I ever feel like
doing this again. See you later, Rebecca, and love.
I'll read this-all through carefully to make sure I say what I'm saying and not something else.
love,
Colin
.