June 25, 1996 |
This is my sociology project;
the project being to help change society in the way I attempt to
describe in this letter. Please let me know of ways this letter can
be more effective.
Erich Fromm starts "The Art of Loving" with, "Any theory of love must begin with a theory of man, of human existence." I would do well to reorganize this following his example, but for now, I just want to get this out, and see what and if you think of it. Being, what is it? I imagine you smile. You read on, and then what.
You are now, for the moment, incapable of doing anything. You feel as I feel, and you understand. You ask yourself, "What am I?". You imagine yourself dead, and ask yourself, "What have I been." You put this down, and try to go back to your work, but you stop.
You want nothing more than to be with someone else,
— Is there any point in living if you are the only thing in existence? I say no, and feel also there is no immediately apparent point in living if I am the only human in existence in the present, past and future. Being is only meaningful if you exist as well as I. — Simply `being' would be enough if you were the only being. Since there are quite a few beings, separate beings, `being together' is all. — I can only be with you inasmuch as you are separate from every group except humankind. Its impossible now, is it? I cannot be with you if you are {just about any religion} first,
I cannot be with you unless you are are first and last yourself and only yourself and nothing else. Only we who are unique, different from everything else, only we can be together. Not a problem. You are no matter what you do— no matter what |
you do, you are separate, you are unique.
It is a consciousness thing though, you must be consciously aware that you are separate from everything (everyone) else, to be together with other people. Here I am saying this, and at the same time hoping that my desire to be with you is the same as your desire. This desire for oneness is a characteristic of separateness. Just as you are separate no matter what you do, you desire to transcend this separateness, no matter what you think.(?) — At the risk of nothing, I will ask what is `being together', and
I will answer, `loving'.
— Here I am going to stop— I don't know what loving or being together is, It is something we do, though. I am going to ask those who want to be together simply to be together to come together. And those who want to explore the ideas here further, too. I was thinking we could meet this Friday at 6:00 p.m. in the Sylvan Theater, and if it's raining, meet there too. Maybe bring something to sit on, plan to stay forever. In fact, the convocation of a group of explorers is the primary purpose of this letter. I imagine going to this place, Sylvan Theater, on Friday at 6:00,
probably a little before. I will probably sit at the end furthest
away from the road, the end furthest away from the columns. I will
be the only one there.
In general, the question we ask is the question of what is the best part of life, what have we loved most about our own life, and what do other people like most about their lives. |
Side 2 |
But does
this thinking get us anywhere? —{(Thought is the most subtle form
of ignorance.) Thinking does not get us anywhere unless it leads
to action. The action justifies the thought.}
The best parts of my life have been when I have felt together with people, so then why do I spend all this time typing away by myself? Because the activities of those people I could be with seem in someway superficial to me. The activities I could be engaging in appear to me to be less than living. A distraction from what we should be doing. We should be creating, loving, being, not occupying our mind with games or logic problems, but being. The goal is to determine the best part of being and be that way more. The goal is to determine a direction for the individual and collective individuals. Collective society needs to work for a world where the individual is recognized and appreciated as the most beautiful manifestation of the society. Each individual should be appreciated for herself, by herself and by the others around her. Conversation should not focus on the superficial, but the immediate concerns and emotions of the individual. What if this world is realized,
what will it be like? People will focus on their own selves and the people
around them whom they can appreciate as individuals. They will spend time
with their own selves, with eachother and for eachother. They will spend
time exploring themselves and exploring others Yes this is a product of my aloneness, but I am alone for a reason. I am alone because I do not want to be together superficially, for apparently someother purpose. I want to be with other people simply to be with them. {redundant, I pound it in.} What do people do when they are with other people simply to be with them? Nothing and everything. They are open about the purpose. What would be the effect on society
if the focus changed thus? People would choose settings that allowed
them to best be with other people. Would people have professions—
would people have professions? People would —
|
later.} But this even is not necessary. The people of this
paper (?) will consider themselves first members of humankind, and
last members of humankind, and then members of their respective groups.
{I cannot feel a part of a group which others cannot be a part. You may be a part of a group, but I cannot be a part of it unless I give up some of myself. I cannot say a religion or cultural heritage is more important than what I believe to be important for myself. I have no religion but what I develop, and I have no cultural heritage but the one I create. Any limiting of horizon sucks, so I will be a part of no group but humankind} {and why not just be? why not be a member of no group but the group of all things in existence. Man is "life being aware of itself"1 and thus is different, distinct, from all that is not human. I cannot be with a rock as I can be with a human.} {the less your individuality, the less your need to transcend it. The path of the human: acknowledging separateness, then transcending separateness.} How many hypocrites will we be? None I think— only we who are true to ourselves can be true to others. Only we who respect ourselves can respect others. But who knows. Probably just 1. So my personal goal is this: I, with some help (or do I have individual aspirations) print this letter, and bring together people who are interested in putting these ideas in practice, and we will see what happens from there. The purpose of this paper to ask:
what is the best of life how we can experience more of the best of
life how we can improve upon the best and other questions.
judgement, interest, love, suggestions, ideas, crit: cleath@u
|